Remember Watson? The IBM computer that successfully beat the living beejezus out of an army of Jeopardy champions? Turns out most people think it’s kind of cute. Same thing happened when Deep Blue (still called Deep Thought in 1997) won over six chess games against world champion Garry Kasparov.
It’s cute that a machine beats a human. Just… don’t call it thought: that would be immensely disturbing. Deep Blue is fine Deep Thought is creepy. Watson is fine, as long as he looks like a set of silicon on steroids. It needs to stay a thing. Our psychological and ethical sensors seem to take all AI (artificial intelligence) nudging machines as ultimately creepy when they take a human form.
Admit… you would not mind losing to a chess computer. Chess computers are built to outperform and outsmart us. But, imagine a chess computer looking like this?

More on this pillar: Thought leadership for the five-pillar map of this writing.
Watson: You can be way smarter. As long as you do not look like me http://t.co/yH60zdlI by @dannydevriendt
Nice one 🙂 Watson: You can be way smarter. As long as you do not look like me http://t.co/Q2VEKhs5 via @dannydevriendt
Watson: You can be way smarter. As long as you do not look like me http://t.co/LoAhhgHo via @zite
Watson: You can be way smarter. As long as you do not look like me – another nice one by @dannydevriendt 🙂 http://t.co/9OHAbRPK cc @YvesVS